Legalization of Drugs Argument Essay -- Drug Prohibition Regulation Le

Legalization of Drugs ArgumentMan, as a creature, is inherently bored. Since the dawn of term, it has been thenatural instinct of man to find alternative methods to enhance his being. Themany core by which man has false to include sex, gambling, and the consumptionof substances beyond the requirements of nutrition. The consumption ofsubstances can be further broken down into legal and illegal substances. The read/write head then becomes, who are we to place labels on certain substances bydeeming them legal and prohibit others by creating penalties for their use?The issue of prohibition is certainly not a new one to our nation. In 1919, the18th Amendment prohibited the manufacture, sale or transportation of alcoholicbeverages. Suddenly honest, responsible Americans who just wanted a drink, wereturned into criminals. Respectable bars became underground speak-easys, andlegitimate liquor manufacturers were replaced by criminal bootleggers. Gangwarfare, bribery, and criminal activity r eached an all-time high. Standards onillegal alcohol were oft lower than those on the previously legal alcohol whichled to the blinding or death of many consumers. Finally in 1933, politiciansbuckled and repealed the 18th Amendment. The Prohibition endeavor of the early20th century provides the perfect historical support for the decriminalizationof drugs.Prohibition will work great injury to the cause of temperance. It is a speciesof wastefulness within itself, for it goes beyond the bounds of reason in thatit attempts to control a mans appetite by legislation, and makes a crime out ofthings that are not crimes. A Prohibition law strikes a blow at the veryprinciples upon which our government was founded.The rise in violent crime over the years has been a cite to most. A majorcause of this increase in crime is the illegal trafficking of drugs. As violentcrime continues to increase, we are unable to devote our financial resources andtime into preventing and prosecuting those who c ommit crimes such as murder,rape, and assault. The reason we are unable to devote these resources where theyare needed is because we are foolishly spending them on a bout that we cannotwin-the War on Drugs.Prior to Ronald Reagans War on Drugs, Americas crime rate had been declining.Since the introduction of the new wave drug... ...cal use. Research would also be encouraged as scientists couldsearch for new and practical uses of drugs. There are many wonderful uses ofdrugs that have not yet been identified or perfected and with expanded research,we could shine these new possibilities.Of course, some restrictions would have to be set. Likely, an age restrictionwould have to be adopted. Restricting the use of drugs to adults only, andeducating the youth of the potential dangers should help curb girlish abuse.Prohibiting acts such as driving a vehicle under the influence of a mind-altering substance would likewise be necessary. Another necessity would be thedestruction of all those with prior criminal records due to the arrest orconviction on drug-related charges. Of course, the right of the non-smoker wouldhave to be paramount. In a commonplace facility, non-smoking areas would have to beset up.A system of drug regulation that would include the above provisions, publichealth and agricultural regulations, and a form of gross would discourageabuse, protect public health and safety, reduce crime, and raise revenue.Regulation is the inevitable replacement of prohibition.