Saturday, April 13, 2019

Attitude Towards Women Fathers and Sons Essay Example for Free

Attitude Towards Women Fathers and Sons EssayTo analyze the attitudes towards the women inquire and the most useful starting point would be to look at the representation of the liberated woman, Yevdoxia Kukshina, which give the gate be contrasted with the representation of Bazarovs mother or Nikolai Kirsanovs wife, the women ideals of the older generation. Kukshina is clearly meant to the representative of the radicalism of the 1850s to1860s, the progressive, advanced(a) or educated woman nigilistka or nihilist woman (Richard Stites). She has vowed to defend the rights of women to the last drop of my furrow and is scornful of Sand an out of date woman. She has separated from her husband and plans to go abroad to take up in Paris and Heildelberg. She thus, personifies the emergence of new objectives and tactics among the Russian emancipees of the early 1860s.However, it is also quite unambiguous that while much has been written about Turgenevs attitude towards his nihilist hero, there is no motion that the female nihilist Kukshina is an unflattering caricature and as Walter Smyrniw quotes Turgenev has deliberately portrayed Kukshina as a comical and repulsive emancipee. Walter goes on to argue that in his portrayal of Kukshina, Turgenev lampooned only certain undesirable tendencies generated by Russian emancipees. The worst among them was a lack of genuine involvement, an inadequate commitment to the movement itself.Some unless false the roles of the emancipated women and hence their behaviour was both contrived and unnatural. Although many critics have argued along the same lines of Turgenevs portrayal of Kukshina as a device for irony the progressive louse which Turgenev combed out of Russian reality (Dostoevsky) and that he has assumed the same sentiment in respect to Russian men who merely assumed the pose of materialists and nihilists (eg. Sitnikov), it is hard to escape that in the description of her person and household we find well-nigh of the stereotyping of radical women found in most conservative writing.He did not hesitate in expressing take to be judgments when ridiculing the pretentiousness and hypocrisy of Russian women who merely played the role of emancipees. She is dirty and slovenly in her habits and person, her live is scattered and dusty, her hair disheveled and her dress crumpled. Moreover, her conversation and behaviour is meant to show us that her radicalism is shallow and unaffected. The teller tells us that she greets her guests with a string of questions without waiting for answers. It is important to notice here the fabricators stimulus generalisation here, which would seem to impute lack of serious concern (feminine casualness) to all women as part of their feminine spirit and not to Kukshina as an individual. The narrator draws repeated attention to Kukshinas unattractive physical appearance some as if that were partly her fault.Kukshina is unfortunate enough to show her gums above her top teeth when she laughs and her piano playacting revels her flat-cut fingernails. However, what is most significant in terms of the dominant patriarchal ideology of the mid-nineteenth century Russia is her declaration, Im free, I have no children. From a conservative perspective, this would count as near sacrilegious statement. though Bazarov himself is a serious character, its possible to read Sitnikov as a parody of the younger generation. At Madame Kukshins, the narrator tells us To Sitnikov the chance to be scathing and express contempt was the most agreeable of sensations (13.44).

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.